Apple wants court to rule Samsung infringes on iPhone patents in evidence leak sanctions
While "terminating sanctions" are extreme and very rare, Apple believes Samsung's actions warrant such a punishment and call the leak of excluded exhibits to media outlets an act of "egregious" misconduct.
Samsung on Tuesday sent out an email to various media outlets containing demonstrative exhibits featuring text of a deposition from former Apple designer Shin Nishibori which mentions a "Sony-styled" iPhone. Presiding Judge Lucy Koh excluded the evidence from the case in an earlier order.
To go along with the media packet, Samsung issued a statement which read in part, "the excluded evidence would have established beyond doubt that Samsung did not copy the iPhone design." In a declaration from Samsung attorney John Quinn, it was revealed that he green-lit the email and statement but claimed both were within the limits set forth by the Court and not meant to sway jury bias.
Apple, on the other hand, claims Quinn's actions were intently directed at the jury and "impugned the integrity of the Court."
Slide from Samsung's demonstrative evidence leak. | Source: Samsung
From Thursday's response declaration:
Mr. Quinn made clear Samsungâs position on whether it would respect the Courtâs determinations during arguments on July 31. Confronted with the Courtâs decision to exclude the disputed evidence (after multiple failed motions for reconsideration), Mr. Quinn challenged, âWhatâs the point . . . of having the trial? Whatâs the point?â Samsung then took its âWhatâs the point?â message to the publicâclaiming that the Court was improperly denying Samsung a fair trial.
The declaration goes on to note Samsung's press statement is the latest in a "string of litigation misconduct" of which Apple points out four examples including the spoliation of evidence related to the Korean electronics giant's email deletion protocols.
For the reasons described, Apple requested the Court hand down "severe sanctions" against Samsung for "bad faith conduct" especially pertaining to the press leak debacle. The iPhone maker claims "no remedy other than judgment on Apple's phone design patent claims could fully rectify the harm that Samsung and Mr. Quinn have caused," noting exclusionary sanctions or a mistrial would be insufficient and possibly harmful to its case.
23 Comments
[Certain posters are] really going to get his panties in a bunch over this one.
If the judge did that, Samsung would have an appeal within seconds of the verdict and then be dragged through the courts for years.
Then again, if the jury sides with Apple and the trial is over, Samsung will still revolve the door and file paperwork.
This is going to make both lawyers very rich, but it will send a message to all of the iClone makers that they are officially on notice to make their own stuff and stop using Apple as their R&D department.
Looking forward to the judge's response. Clearly Samsung is aiming for a mistrial. After all the other bad behavior by Samsung and their lawyers up to this point in this particular case the requests by Apple actually seem reasonable. Financial punishment hasn't stopped them yet, serious consequences seem called for now.
[Certain posters are] really going to get his panties in a bunch over this one.
Maybe all these men should stop wearing panties. It might make them more comfortable and open to something that isn't anti-Apple nonsense.
More dung from Samsung that'll probably get'em hung.
When you grapple with Apple don't call them a Sony-phony.