Intel hopes to court developers with iPhone app conversion tool
Intel vice president Doug Fisher revealed the tool in an interview Tuesday, Macworld reports. The tool will simplify the conversion process from an iPhone app to an Intel-based app by identifying the necessary changes, said Fisher.
"Getting people excited to develop to Intel platforms is absolutely critical to us,â Fisher said. Intel's strategy involves developer tools, competitions and improved monetization of apps.
Increased interest in app development for Intel devices would hopefully drive sales of the company's chips. Fisher sees applications heading to AppUp, Intel's app store for netbooks, first, then eventually to MeeGo and even Windows. AppUp was announced in January, but has failed to gain much traction.
The tool could draw developers to the fledgling MeeGo mobile OS. Earlier this year, Intel and Nokia announced a partnership to combine their work on separate Linux-based mobile operating systems into one platform: MeeGo.
Gartner predicts that MeeGo will remain a niche OS with only a small share of the worldwide mobile OS market. 2014 projections by the research firm placed MeeGo in fifth, slightly ahead of the Windows Phone platform.
Intel is pushing to assert itself after having lost ground in the mobile space to ARM Holdings. Although Intel still provides the chips for Apple's Mac line of computers, the Santa Clara, Calif.-company's chips are conspicuously absent from Apple's iOS offerings.
Apple's custom A4 processor, which employs a CPU from ARM, is found in the iPad, iPhone 4, fourth-generation iPod touch, and Apple TV. The new Apple TV in particular was a setback for Intel, as previous versions of the set top box had been based on an Intel processor.
In September, Intel CEO Paul Otellini called the Apple TV redesign a "step backward" while highlighting Intel's partnership with Google on the Google TV platform. Otellini touted Google TV as having the "full internet," unlike Apple TV or the iPhone.
In order to make inroads into the wireless market, Intel purchased German chipmaker Infineon's wireless division this summer for $1.4 billion. Infineon makes the baseband chip for the iPhone. After the purchase, rumors emerged that Apple would swap the Infineon baseband for a Qualcomm one on the next iPhone.
17 Comments
I suppose some will think this means more competition for Apple. But if this tool works well, it more likely means that developers will develop for iPhone first, since that is the biggest single market, and then port their apps to other platforms.
(Yes, I know there are more Droid phones out there than iPhones. But there are more iPhones out there than any single Droid manufacturer/brand/model name.)
And I believe there are more iOS devices out there (which all run most of the same apps) than Android devices. Certainly the share of Internet usage is skewed toward iOS and not Android.
Data showing the Android market > iOS market requires artificially combining many incompatible devices into one total that is a platform in name only. While artificially subtracting huge segments of the iOS market: the iPad and iPod Touch. (And it often means looking only at the US market, where iPhone is on just one carrier?for now?while Android devices are on sale or given away by multiple carriers... who all have different rules about what your ?open? Android device can do.)
(As for ?full Internet??that?s neat but it?s not really what I want from a TV. Games and media, yes, browsing and communication, no. I have a computer and a phone that do those tasks better than any remote control.)
Well I do believe it is fair game for Apple to expand it's CPU options for it's entire Mac line with AMD.
Very interesting indeed.
Let's see...
1. Design and generate the source for the UI with Interface Builder.
2. Translate the IB source to some other language / Framework.
3. Extract the application specific code and translate that as well.
... and Voila
Although other frameworks are missing many of Apple's features...
And Apple could cause problems for Intel if they want to...
Apple frameworks are so well defined and the Apple tools so nice that it might actually be worth it.
Time will tell.